Prince Harry and six other prominent individuals face the risk of having to pay a massive legal bill of approximately £50 million after losing a legal action filed against a newspaper group. The lawsuit was brought against 'Associated Newspapers' (ANL), publishers of the Daily Mail, with the claimants alleging that the company used unlawful methods for news gathering.
However, the High Court dismissed the case, stating that the claimants failed to substantiate any of those allegations.Prince Harry, Doreen Lawrence, Elton John and his partner David Furnish, actors Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost, and former Liberal Democrat minister Simon Hughes acted as claimants in this case. They alleged that the newspaper group systematically employed unlawful information gathering methods for news reporting over many years. However, Justice Nicklin, who delivered the verdict, stated that if the relevant news could have been obtained through any lawful and rational means, it could not be assumed that they were obtained unlawfully.
Commenting after the verdict, Paul Dacre, Editor-in-Chief of 'Associated Newspapers', said that the reputation of his journalists had been vindicated by this decision. He further stated that his company's journalists obtained information through press offices, previously published articles, or other ordinary sources, and that their professional integrity had been protected. The judge accepted his previous statement during the Leveson Inquiry that hacking methods were not used within the newspaper organization.
During the trial, it was revealed in court that the testimony of Gavin Burrows, a witness heavily relied upon by the claimants, was baseless and false. The confirmation that his testimony was inadmissible dealt a significant setback to the claimants' legal team. With this verdict, the newspaper group is expected to seek to recover its legal costs, which is estimated to be a substantial financial burden of up to £50 million for the claimants.