![Gossip Lanka News [English]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhYm2aFFq-bIW1nWX-RrqnPFoIsVos6_VCVz8BpLt0QJi55GNXHXC2fugeRvL0qUStEuCfs7Sfu6ZiSlhrkldxfGuE_wzy5gitY6rMZ2KSi8VBbGvkgXLks37RwZV-4-HKbWiNLRxB8C_r1e4z3mpxFTMPDJPEADoG8E-bZteWFipeD5KNGbjvCfqEfKw=s300 "Gossip Lanka News [English]")
Background: Bribery and Corruption in Sri Lanka
Bribery and corruption have been persistent challenges in Sri Lanka’s governance landscape. Various sectors, particularly the public sector, have long been marred by unethical practices, misuse of public funds, and a lack of accountability. Despite legislative frameworks and institutions established to counter corruption, enforcement and follow-through have historically been weak or inconsistent.
The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) is Sri Lanka's main anti-corruption body. While CIABOC has launched numerous investigations over the years, public frustration has grown over delays in prosecution and political interference.
However, in a recent development, CIABOC is preparing to file approximately 50 court cases related to long-standing investigations, signaling a potential shift in approach and accountability.
Key Features of the Current Anti-Corruption Drive
A Surge in Legal Action
CIABOC has concluded several major investigations and is set to file indictments before the Colombo High Court.
Many of these cases have been pending for years.
The majority of those facing charges are government officials, including several senior officials.
High-Profile Cases
Among the high-profile cases is that of Parliamentarian Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, arrested in connection to:
Misuse of Rs. 17.3 million in public funds during his tenure as Chief Minister of the Uva Provincial Council.
Premature withdrawal of fixed deposit funds, allegedly causing losses to the state.
Political Interference and Legal Complications
The Dassanayake case has hit a roadblock after a public statement by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, who claimed:
The fund withdrawals were in line with a Treasury circular.
The circular was issued with the approval of then-President Maithripala Sirisena.
The rule required spending of government funds within the year or returning them to the treasury, disallowing fixed deposits.
This statement has introduced a legal grey area, with CIABOC requesting a statement from Mr. Wickremesinghe. However, he has not yet provided a new date after declining the original appointment.
Challenges Ahead for CIABOC
Delays in witness cooperation and potential political influence remain major hurdles.
Public trust depends on whether CIABOC can pursue these cases independently and transparently.
The effectiveness of these court cases may define the future credibility of anti-corruption efforts in Sri Lanka.
A Turning Point or Another False Start?
While CIABOC’s move to file 50 cases shows intent, the coming months will reveal whether these legal actions result in meaningful accountability or dissolve under political pressure. The nation watches closely, hoping for a cleaner, more transparent future.